----- Original Message ----- From: To: Sent: Monday, November 16, 2009 5:31 PM Subject: RE: hrep 0911.2935 BP-sr2.tex -> 0911.2935.gz (0911.2935, 7kb) > To verify abstract and postscript, use http://arxiv.org/abs/0911.2935 > Article-id: 0911.2935, Article password: zk2qy (access still password restricted) > Abstract will appear in mailing scheduled to begin at 20:00 Monday > US Eastern time (i.e., Tue 17 Nov 09 01:00:00 GMT). > > Your replacement has been received and used to replace your earlier submission. > Attached below is an exact copy of the permanent abstract file of your paper. > Please note that if your originally put abstract has already appeared in a > daily mailing, then ONLY the Title/Author/Comments/Report-no/Journal-ref fields > will be used to indicate your replacement in the next mailing. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > \\ > arXiv:0911.2935 > From: William Y. C. Chen > Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 09:31:11 GMT (7kb) > > Title: Balanced Properties of the q-Derangement Numbers and the q-Catalan > Numbers > Authors: William Y.C. Chen, David G.L. Wang, and Larry X.W. Wang > Categories: math.CO > Comments: 9 pages > License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ > \\ > Based on Bona's condition for the balanced property of the number of cycles > of permutations, we give a general criterion for the balanced property in terms > of the generating function of a statistic. We show that the q-derangement > numbers and the q-Catalan numbers satisfy the balanced property. > \\ > > Contains: > BP-sr2.tex: 23059 bytes > > Stored as: 0911.2935.gz (7kb) > > Warnings: > > Author 1: William Y.C. Chen > Author 2: David G.L. Wang > Author 3: Larry X.W. Wang > -> Number of authors = 3 > > > PS files: > 0911.2935.ps.gz (66kb) > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Successful submission to the archives can be a significant source of pride > and accomplishment. It entails many serious responsibilities: > if you can't check off on all items below, then you need to replace again. > > ___ The Title/Author fields above are correct. > ___ The abstract remains complete, correct, and wrapped correctly. > ___ Capitalization in title correct (we automatically lower case titles > with excessive use of upper case, but we get some acronyms incorrect > -- replace with uppercase letters only where they should be). > ___ The authors are listed in `Firstname Lastname' order. > ___ any anonymous ftp or http pointers to additional files are given in > standard url format (e.g. ftp://myhost.domain/path/filename.ext > or http://mywwwhost.domain/path/filename.html) > ___ Periods are separated by a space from the end of any URL's > ___ Any Journal-ref is a complete bibliographic reference to an already > published version (includes volume and page number info in the case > of a print journal). > ___ All comments about why the paper was replaced are in the Comments: field > (i.e. not parenthetically after the Title:, or only in the abstract), > and you retained ALL earlier relevant Comments (e.g. number of pages) > ___ You have included all the files, e.g. figures (the entire previous > submission has been overwritten). > ___ The submission can still be retrieved uncorrupted (TRY IT). > > Submitters who repeatedly leave errors uncorrected may lose submission > privilege to the archives. > > If your abstract is improperly wrapped, note that abstract linefill stops at > whitespace indentation (e.g. a blank line or a line indented with space(s) > denotes a new paragraph,and won't be wrapped). > > For further hints, keep reading or see http://arXiv.org/help/ . Guidelines > for a proper title and abstract preparation are given at > http://arXiv.org/help/prep . If you have not already read this, please read > it now to ensure that you have followed the guidelines. It is an abuse of > valuable archive admin time to edit abstracts by hand. > > If this is a replacement on the same day as original submittal, it will > not generate a "replaced" listing in the daily title/abstract distribution > (if replaced before the daily deadline of 16:00 US Eastern time [EDT/EST] > Monday through Friday). > > Otherwise, a copy of the original day's submission has been archived; and more > generally each version in the full revision history will remain available. > > ***NOTES*** > 1) Common sense suggests that `replaced' papers are not immediately > rerequested so if your intent is to communicate correct research > it is in your interest to submit a final version in the first place, > i.e. *avoid premature submissions*. > If your replaced submission constitutes a new version, it is helpful to > indicate in the Comments: field (i.e. below Authors: ) how serious is the > revision (e.g. v2: major conceptual changes, v3: minor grammatical changes, > etc.), and include as a commented header in the revised version of the paper > a guide to the changes for posterity. > *** Make sure that these changes are in the Comments: field (i.e. after the > Authors: ) and that your Abstract still appears *** > > 2) Avoid excessive cross-listings: cross-listings of a paper on archive-x to > archive-y are intended for subjects of *direct* interest to subscribers of > archive-y. Those subscribers of archive-y who have peripheral or direct > interest in the subjects of archive-x are already subscribed to archive-x and > neither need nor desire multiple receipt of the same abstract. (In particular, > it is exceedingly unlikely that you could decide what is of direct interest to > readers of archive-y if you yourself are not an active reader of archive-y.) >